翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Ontario general election, 2007 ・ Ontario general election, 2011 ・ Ontario general election, 2014 ・ Ontario Genomics Institute ・ Ontario Geological Survey ・ Ontario Global Edge Program ・ Ontario Good Roads Association ・ Ontario Government Buildings ・ Ontario (AG) v Canada Temperance Federation ・ Ontario (Amtrak station) ・ Ontario (CDP), New York ・ Ontario (computer virus) ・ Ontario (disambiguation) ・ Ontario (electoral district) ・ Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Etobicoke (Borough of) ・ Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd ・ Ontario (Old Order) Mennonite Conference ・ Ontario (provincial electoral district) ・ Ontario Academic Credit ・ Ontario Access Coalition ・ Ontario Agricorp ・ Ontario Agricultural College ・ Ontario Air National Guard Station ・ Ontario Alliance of Christian Schools ・ Ontario Amateur Softball Association ・ Ontario and Livingston Mutual Insurance Office ・ Ontario and Pacific Junction Railway ・ Ontario and Quebec Railway ・ Ontario and Rainy River Railway ・ Ontario and Western Railroad Passenger Station Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd ： ウィキペディア英語版 Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd ''Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd'', () 2 S.C.R. 536 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision where the Court first acknowledged the existence of indirect discrimination through conduct that creates prejudicial effect. ==Background== Theresa O'Malley was a Seventh-day Adventist who was employed by the retailer Simpsons-Sears. As part of her religion she was forbidden from working from sundown on Friday to sundown on Saturday. There were no full-time shifts available that did not require work on Friday and Saturday, so the company terminated her employment. Simpsons-Sears argued that by requiring all their employees to work Fridays and Saturdays, they were not intentionally trying to discriminate against her; rather, it was a neutral requirement they imposed on all employees. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether the requirement that all employees work on Friday and Saturday was discriminatory against her religion. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.